The strongest boundary is the one that does not require a speech.
LEADERSHIP
LEADERSHIP
A boundary that has to be explained, justified, and defended tends to invite negotiation, because the explanation implies there is a case to be made and therefore a case to be argued against. The most durable ones are short and simply held: no, not this, not available. Their strength comes from consistency rather than from the reasoning behind them. You are allowed to have limits you do not defend.
Practise a one-sentence version of a boundary you keep over-explaining. Say it plainly and then stop talking, which is the hard part. Repetition without elaboration is what actually establishes it.
Which of your boundaries needs less explaining and more holding?
Free, with nothing to buy inside it.